1 / 5
Red Coats Vs Blue Coats Which Side Really Won - ie1rdmz
2 / 5
Red Coats Vs Blue Coats Which Side Really Won - iz4els9
3 / 5
Red Coats Vs Blue Coats Which Side Really Won - 90u9twi
4 / 5
Red Coats Vs Blue Coats Which Side Really Won - 30yaalt
5 / 5
Red Coats Vs Blue Coats Which Side Really Won - ozo3exg


· he won this battle, and although the victory was small in tactical terms, it had a wider strategic impact, … · blue coats were more practical —they blended in better than bright red, especially in forests and … The most iconic part of a british soldier’s uniform was their bright red coat. Made of wool, it would have different color facings (the lapels, cuffs, and lining) depending on the soldier’s regiment. · according to an article in soldiers magazine, in 1782, blue coats with red facings became the standard uniform for all regiments and personnel except generals and staff officers. Over the shirt, a red or white waistcoat would be worn. Union uniforms featured red trim for artillery, blue for infantry, and yellow for cavalry troops. Fear of punishment was a good reason to stay. · this includes color differences in the facings and trims of their coats. As the southern military tradition came from the u. s. Soldiers who left the army, or deserted, were executed if they were caught. Army, confederate uniforms adopted these colors and meanings also. In this situation, the soldier might stand in front of a coffin while a firing squad shot at him. Just the same, some escaped and joined the american army, even helping train the men. All soldiers wore blue coats and the facings (lapels, collars,cuffs) were left to the regiment to decide. The jager units of riflemen wore green with red facing.